Showing posts with label queries. Show all posts
Showing posts with label queries. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

A Question and an Answer

(This post has been updated in bold. Also, I would like to say that these posts in no way reflect the opinions and thoughts of the agent I read for, and not all of the things I post about are things learned from AA, so don't assume that what I say is coming to you straight from the mouth of an agent, okay? Okay, sorry, I felt that might be necessary to say.)

First of all, sorry I never got around to responding to all of your comments. I promise I read them all, and I'm happy to say there are quite a few books you all are reading that I've never heard of and will have to look up. Oh, and there's a new background again because my old one expired and I got tired of looking for it...

Now then, there was a great question asked the other day by Alexandra Shostak, who has a great blog by the way, in the comments of a query post, and I wanted to answer it on the blog. She said, "It's interesting to hear that some previously published authors are querying agents. I always wondered how that worked, Amanda. Wouldn't they already have agents? Or, if not, why, and would that be a red flag at all for a prospective client? (Maybe they're difficult to work with, for example?)"

Friday, July 23, 2010

Some Query Stats

On a blog related note, I'm going to have to cut back on posting. I'll try to do at least one review a week, but everything else right now is up in the air. Blogging is pretty much the least important thing going on right now so I'll try to keep up with all of your blog, but expect things to be slower around here.

When I first started with AA, I requested a lot more than I did today. Why? Because I was paying more attention to the concept and a person's credentials than I was the writing. I was willing to over look typos and an awkward sentence or three if the idea was intriguing. I was even willing to request a partial for something with an unusually high word count, though when it comes to queries unusually high isn't really saying much. (I had a 295k query today. No joke.) I have learned my lesson, and will more than likely keep learning as I go. 

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Queries!

I've been slacking when it comes to reading things of the published variety as of late. So reviews will, hopefully, resume on Monday.

So, now that it's 3:40 in the afternoon here and I haven't posted, I thought I'd talk about queries. Most of you will probably already know all of this, but maybe I can shed some light on something.

DO:

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails